Structural Myelopathies.

OBJECTIVE: This article illustrates the clinical importance, diagnosis, and management of degenerative and nondegenerative structural myelopathies. It also aims to create a diagnostic approach for the evaluation of patients with suspected degenerative myelopathies. LATEST DEVELOPMENTS: There is considerable interest in developing diagnostic methods that can assist in deciding if surgery is indicated in patients with structural myelopathy and the optimal timing for surgery. Diffusion tensor imaging has emerged as a promising imaging modality although it is not used routinely in clinical practice. Neuroprotective medications and interventions are being studied in patients with degenerative myelopathies. ESSENTIAL POINTS: Structural myelopathies and particularly degenerative myelopathies are common disorders that are routinely encountered in clinical practice, with symptoms that frequently overlap with other neurologic disorders. The prompt diagnosis and treatment of patients are essential in achieving good functional outcomes.

Cervical and Thoracic Spondylotic Myelopathies.

Spondylotic myelopathies are among the most common disorders of the spine, yet the clinical and treatment approach is far from standardized. This article discusses our current understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical assessment, natural history, and treatment options in degenerative myelopathies of the cervical and thoracic spine. We additionally review diagnostic modalities including imaging modalities of the spine and neurophysiological tools such as electromyography/nerve conduction studies, somatosensory-evoked potentials, and motor-evoked potentials. Assessment instruments that can be used for the assessment of myelopathies are reviewed, including the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, modified-JOA scale, Nurick scale, nine-hole peg test, and 30-m walking test. We also review common disorders that mimic spondylotic myelopathies, as well as helpful diagnostic clues in differentiating spondylotic and nonspondylotic myelopathies.

The Effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Axial Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.

OBJECTIVE: Determine the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the treatment of axial low back pain (LBP) with or without leg pain. DESIGN: Systematic review. SUBJECTS: Persons aged ≥18 with axial LBP with or without accompanying leg pain. INTERVENTION: Traditional low-frequency, burst, or high-frequency SCS. COMPARISON: Sham, active standard of care treatment, or none. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was ≥50% pain improvement, and the secondary outcome was functional improvement measured six or more months after treatment intervention. METHODS: Publications in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were reviewed through September 19, 2019. Randomized or nonrandomized comparative studies and nonrandomized studies without internal controls were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and GRADE system were used to assess individual study characteristics and overall quality. RESULTS: Query identified 262 publications; 17 were suitable for inclusion. For high-frequency SCS, the only level 1 study showed that 79% (95% confidence interval = 70-87%) of patients reported ≥50% pain improvement. For low-frequency SCS, the only level 1 study reported no categorical data for axial LBP-specific outcomes; axial LBP improved by a mean 14 mm on the visual analog scale at six months. Meta-analysis was not performed due to study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: According to GRADE, there is low-quality evidence that high-frequency SCS compared with low-frequency SCS is effective in patients with axial LBP with concomitant leg pain. There is very low-quality evidence for low-frequency SCS for the treatment of axial LBP in patients with concomitant leg pain. There is insufficient evidence addressing the effectiveness of burst SCS to apply a GRADE rating.